HAVING
tried all the delay tricks in the book, President Goodluck Jonathan is
now confronted with a choice: retain the Aviation Minister, Stella
Oduah, or sack her. The President’s body language and vacillation
demonstrate unmistakeably that he prefers to keep the controversial
minister. This is a tragic error of judgment and confirms to the whole
world what many Nigerians already know: that Jonathan’s body language
encourages corruption.
Indeed, most Nigerians believe that under
the current administration, the war against corruption is virtually
lost. Jonathan will only be confirming the view of critics by his
continued waffling over Oduahgate. Surely, he does his
credibility no good by retaining a minister that has been so tainted in a
corruption scandal. Just two weeks ago, in response to an acerbic
letter to him from a former President, Olusegun Obasanjo, which was
leaked to the press, he pompously declared that he (Jonathan) was
fighting corruption. “I have been strengthening the institutions
established to fight corruption. I will not shield any government
official or private individual involved in corruption…,” he declared.
But he has been shielding Oduah in the
full glare of the public. When the news first broke in October via an
online publication that the minister had allegedly caused two
bullet-proof BMW limousines to be purchased for her by the Nigerian
Civil Aviation Authority, in violation of the law, he kept quiet. It was
only after much public outcry and a probe got under way at the House of
Representatives that he belatedly asked her to be queried. As more
revelations emerged from the House probe demonstrating how the minster
exceeded her spending limits of N100 million, how import duty waivers
were misapplied and how NCAA officials and other aviation parastatals
“contravened the Appropriation Act 2013,” Jonathan sought to buy time by
setting up an unnecessary three-man administrative panel to examine the
case.
Diversionary though it was, the panel had
submitted its report since mid-November. While one can concede to the
President the need to be cautious to avoid penalising the innocent,
seven weeks after the panel turned in its report and another two after a
damning verdict by the House probe should surely be enough for the
President to demonstrate that he truly abhors corruption. If his
concern, as he said in his response to Obasanjo, is “to follow due
process in all that I do,” this high-minded requirement has been amply
met by the House probe and his own panel.
Jonathan is simply not serious about
combating corruption as widely alleged by his critics and confirmed by
all global corruption rating agencies. The standard worldwide by nations
where corruption is truly detested is to fire any official tainted by
even a whiff of wrongdoing if the person fails to resign. Jonathan has
not been asked to convict Oduah; only a court of law can do that. All
that Nigerians expect of him, and as the House of Representatives
recommended, is that he should fire Oduah. She has been sufficiently
tainted to make her continued presence in government odious.
In Turkey, three top cabinet ministers
have resigned in a corruption case that does not even name them directly
as beneficiaries; in Ghana, a deputy minister of communications was
promptly sacked by President John Mahama for merely expressing a desire
to make $1 million in politics; in Italy, a three-time prime minister,
Silvio Berlusconi, has been convicted on corruption charges, while a
former Israeli president, Ezer Weizman, was investigated and only
avoided criminal prosecution due to the statute of limitation. In any
other country, Oduah would have since resigned or been sacked and,
together with the complicit aviation officials, prosecuted. Indeed,
prosecution would afford Oduah an opportunity to prove the innocence she
has steadfastly claimed.
Jonathan is letting another opportunity
to take a stand against corruption slip by. Does he relish Nigeria’s
persistent rating as one of the most corrupt nations on earth? The
nation’s landscape is littered with unresolved corruption scandals to
the extent that many Nigerians consider corruption to be much worse than
our latest rating as the world’s 144th out of 177 in the Transparency
International’s Corruption Perception Index. His declaration in his 2014
New Year message that he would “take additional steps to stem the tide
of corruption and leakages” sounds patently hollow.
Nigerians should not allow Jonathan and
Oduah to get away with this missuse of public office. Since our
President cannot live up to the standards of decorum in public office
that the world has now come to accept, the House of Representatives
should not stop at its recommendations; it should insist that Nigeria
meets global practices in public morality and seriously combats
corruption.
The Oduah case goes beyond partisan
politics; corruption has laid Nigeria low and handicapped all
development efforts. Public officials are stealing the people blind at
the federal, state and local government levels and the anti-graft
agencies appear to have lost their bite.
However, it is not too late for Jonathan
to stamp out the stench of corruption swirling around his Presidency by
genuinely backing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the
Independent Corrupt Practices and Related Offences Commission and the
Code of Conduct Bureau to fulfil their mandate. He should change his
body language and send clear signals that corruption will no longer be
tolerated.
The place to start is by sacking Oduah.
No comments:
Post a Comment